And it's been worrying me.
As an aspiration I have no problem with it. It seems to me right, even a spiritual duty, that we should struggle towards personal integrity of life (body, mind and soul), and towards integrity of our life with the will and Spirit of God (always recognising that this is an unattainable goal, at least in this world).
But there is an edge of spiritual blackmail about the phrase when it comes to praying together. Does it mean, perhaps: 'I want all of you praying with me to agree with me.'?
Or does it mean: if we are not in agreement then our relationships with God, and hence these prayers, are all diminished?
I suspect the idea stems from the common-sense syllogism that:
- We are all Christian believers;
- God is one and undivided; therefore
- All Christian believers should be united. (Disunity is prima facie evidence of a wrong relationship with God.)
In fact the desire for unity is a powerful force for division. The more that conservatives insist that ECUSA and the Anglican Communion must embody their agenda the more they destroy the faith they have inherited from the saints. Anglicans Online (always full of common sense) has this reflection on the notion that 'our church has been taken away from us'.
The desire for purity denies the generosity of God. The campaign for a narrow unity divides one Christian from another. The search for certainty becomes idolatry: we set up formulae to articulate an understanding of faith and end up making the words more important than openness to God.
Let us pray in the common cause of worship and service of God, bringing all our gifts, our conflicts, our uncertainties to our sharing together.
After all, just because we're Christian it doesn't mean we have to like one another.
No comments:
Post a Comment